Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73601 - 73610 of 77543 for judgment for u s.
Search results 73601 - 73610 of 77543 for judgment for u s.
Peter Galowski v. Gerald Berge
and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the agency official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14020 - 2005-03-31
and represented the committee’s will and not its judgment, and (4) the evidence was such that the agency official
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14020 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. War N. Marion
the judgment of conviction. See State v. Marion, No. 01-3117-CR-NM, unpublished slip op. (WI App Apr. 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20963 - 2017-09-21
the judgment of conviction. See State v. Marion, No. 01-3117-CR-NM, unpublished slip op. (WI App Apr. 22
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20963 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the 1994 judgment of conviction and the 1995 denial of postconviction relief had long since expired. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187048 - 2017-09-21
the 1994 judgment of conviction and the 1995 denial of postconviction relief had long since expired. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187048 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
court sentenced him to a ten-year prison term. This court affirmed that judgment. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
court sentenced him to a ten-year prison term. This court affirmed that judgment. See State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168990 - 2017-09-21
Thomas Richmond v. William Puckett
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11635 - 2005-03-31
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11635 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirmed the judgment and an order denying Givens’ motion for sentence reduction. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
. We affirmed the judgment and an order denying Givens’ motion for sentence reduction. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37302 - 2009-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
its own judgment predicated on alleged errors of fact.” Coram Nobis, BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 388
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
its own judgment predicated on alleged errors of fact.” Coram Nobis, BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 388
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=618565 - 2023-02-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=115638 - 2017-09-21
Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company v. State
, this court cannot give the required weight to the administrative agency's value judgment based upon its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10536 - 2005-03-31
, this court cannot give the required weight to the administrative agency's value judgment based upon its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10536 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of the record discloses no other issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119179 - 2014-08-11
of the record discloses no other issues of arguable merit. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119179 - 2014-08-11