Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7381 - 7390 of 73966 for public records.
Search results 7381 - 7390 of 73966 for public records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion when it did not refer McCotry to the state public defender for an indigency determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96778 - 2014-09-15
discretion when it did not refer McCotry to the state public defender for an indigency determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96778 - 2014-09-15
State v. Ervin Burris
of the public’s welfare or your rehabilitation. …. 4. You shall inform your agent of your whereabouts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2634 - 2005-03-31
of the public’s welfare or your rehabilitation. …. 4. You shall inform your agent of your whereabouts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2634 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
ABC for Health, Inc. v. Commissioner of Insurance
by substantial evidence in the record. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6); Madison Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3208 - 2017-09-19
by substantial evidence in the record. WIS. STAT. § 227.57(6); Madison Gas & Elec. Co. v. Public Serv. Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3208 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ervin Burris
or county ordinances or that is not in the best interest of the public’s welfare or your rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2634 - 2017-09-19
or county ordinances or that is not in the best interest of the public’s welfare or your rehabilitation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2634 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
) erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not refer McCotry to the state public defender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96778 - 2013-05-20
) erroneously exercised its discretion when it did not refer McCotry to the state public defender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96778 - 2013-05-20
[PDF]
Hugh R. Mommsen v. Duane Schueller
property to a public thoroughfare. Because the County was authorized to adopt the ordinance, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14709 - 2017-09-21
property to a public thoroughfare. Because the County was authorized to adopt the ordinance, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14709 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
that a mandate that does not require further development of the record is a mandate for "specific action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17325 - 2017-09-21
that a mandate that does not require further development of the record is a mandate for "specific action
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17325 - 2017-09-21
J. H. Findorff & Son, Inc. v. Circuit Court for Milwaukee County
not require further development of the record is a mandate for "specific action." Slip op. at 4-5 (citing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17325 - 2005-03-31
not require further development of the record is a mandate for "specific action." Slip op. at 4-5 (citing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17325 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Comments on Supreme Court rule 14-03 - Courthouse News Service
. Box 1688 Madison, WI 53701-1688 RE: Public Hearing on Rule Petition 14-03, Petition to Create Wis
/supreme/docs/1403commentscourthousenews.pdf - 2016-02-04
. Box 1688 Madison, WI 53701-1688 RE: Public Hearing on Rule Petition 14-03, Petition to Create Wis
/supreme/docs/1403commentscourthousenews.pdf - 2016-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the certiorari record may dismiss a common law certiorari claim based on the court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23
the certiorari record may dismiss a common law certiorari claim based on the court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026784 - 2025-10-23