Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7381 - 7390 of 74953 for public records.
Search results 7381 - 7390 of 74953 for public records.
State v. Jimmie L. Perkins
to specify the objectives of the sentence on the record. These objectives include, but are not limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31
to specify the objectives of the sentence on the record. These objectives include, but are not limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7280 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Jones
claimed to have left the group. In light of Jones’s history, the need to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14343 - 2014-09-15
claimed to have left the group. In light of Jones’s history, the need to protect the public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14343 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186424 - 2017-09-21
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186424 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
SC Table of Pending Cases - Added decision in 2014AP2813-CR, 2015AP207 and 2016AP923-W
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187327 - 2017-09-21
policy violates Wisconsin’s public records law? Does Wis. Stat. § 19.70 require the DOJ to correct
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187327 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
or subversive to the public interest. Accordingly, we deny Harman's petition for reinstatement.1 Furthermore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21
or subversive to the public interest. Accordingly, we deny Harman's petition for reinstatement.1 Furthermore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06
report and the record, we conclude that no arguably meritorious issues exist for an appeal, and we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218828 - 2018-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the public.” State v. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. The record further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
the public.” State v. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. The record further
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the public.” State v. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. The record further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
the public.” State v. Ziegler, 2006 WI App 49, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. The record further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=877041 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Stroik did not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231140 - 2018-12-18
. Stroik did not file a response. Based upon our review of the no-merit report and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231140 - 2018-12-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
response. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563254 - 2022-09-07
response. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563254 - 2022-09-07