Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73821 - 73830 of 83879 for simple case search.
Search results 73821 - 73830 of 83879 for simple case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
revocation sentence, he was not entitled to that same credit on his consecutive sentence in this case. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
revocation sentence, he was not entitled to that same credit on his consecutive sentence in this case. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=886419 - 2024-12-11
[PDF]
NOTICE
deprives him of due process and equal protection. Lagundoye controls Azizi’s case. See id., 268 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29961 - 2014-09-15
deprives him of due process and equal protection. Lagundoye controls Azizi’s case. See id., 268 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29961 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
brief. We conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204740 - 2017-12-13
brief. We conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204740 - 2017-12-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the sentencing factors to the facts of this case, reaching a reasoned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322478 - 2021-01-13
the sentencing factors to the facts of this case, reaching a reasoned
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322478 - 2021-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111217 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111217 - 2017-09-21
Virginia Camden v. Jerry Alan Camden
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Pursuant to our order of March 20, 2001, this case was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3565 - 2005-03-31
. Rule 809.23(1)(b)5. [1] Pursuant to our order of March 20, 2001, this case was placed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3565 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Paula Lucas v. Delano E. Lucas
with Langhoff was rebutted. Well, I think the weight of the evidence in this case indicates that the best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6830 - 2017-09-20
with Langhoff was rebutted. Well, I think the weight of the evidence in this case indicates that the best
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6830 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Torey U. Jennings
1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. NO. 97-2570-CR-NM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21
1 This case is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), STATS. NO. 97-2570-CR-NM
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12974 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses Woodman’s pleas and sentences. Woodman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552331 - 2022-08-09
sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses Woodman’s pleas and sentences. Woodman
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=552331 - 2022-08-09
[PDF]
State v. Antonio Herrera, Jr.
, despite the difference in their physical stature, was necessary to the jury’s understanding of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3644 - 2017-09-19
, despite the difference in their physical stature, was necessary to the jury’s understanding of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3644 - 2017-09-19