Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73831 - 73840 of 83054 for simple case.
Search results 73831 - 73840 of 83054 for simple case.
State v. Henry James Brookshire
, Blakely is not applicable. When, as in Brookshire’s case, the court exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18298 - 2005-05-31
, Blakely is not applicable. When, as in Brookshire’s case, the court exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18298 - 2005-05-31
Jeffrey A. Librande v. Allstate Insurance Company
to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, we look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7018 - 2005-03-31
to determine whether they establish a prima facie case for summary judgment. If they do, we look
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7018 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jay L. Weiss
considered that this was not a case in which the defendant disputed that he engaged in the conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18266 - 2005-05-24
considered that this was not a case in which the defendant disputed that he engaged in the conduct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18266 - 2005-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS
condemned by certain of the case law. The requirement of verification is addressed to matters of not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33919 - 2005-03-31
condemned by certain of the case law. The requirement of verification is addressed to matters of not only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33919 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Mikel
that Mikel’s counsel had had a sufficient opportunity to discuss the case and the plea decision with his client
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
that Mikel’s counsel had had a sufficient opportunity to discuss the case and the plea decision with his client
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12419 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, the sentence, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140514 - 2015-04-28
, ¶23, 289 Wis. 2d 594, 712 N.W.2d 76. Under the circumstances of the case, the sentence, which
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140514 - 2015-04-28
State v. Mark Anderson
. This, we conclude, is such a case. We uphold the trial court's probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10059 - 2005-03-31
. This, we conclude, is such a case. We uphold the trial court's probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10059 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
had given statements to police earlier in the case implicating Linden in both drug deliveries. Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27844 - 2014-07-22
had given statements to police earlier in the case implicating Linden in both drug deliveries. Trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27844 - 2014-07-22
State v. Jeremy J. Mayotte
to the exclusionary rule applies to this case. By the Court.—Judgment and order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20905 - 2006-01-09
to the exclusionary rule applies to this case. By the Court.—Judgment and order reversed and cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20905 - 2006-01-09
[PDF]
Annual Report
22.10. The Supreme Court imposed discipline in eight cases. Two respondent lawyers were issued
/courts/offices/docs/olr2025fiscal.pdf - 2025-10-16
22.10. The Supreme Court imposed discipline in eight cases. Two respondent lawyers were issued
/courts/offices/docs/olr2025fiscal.pdf - 2025-10-16