Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73851 - 73860 of 91919 for 1.
Search results 73851 - 73860 of 91919 for 1.
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97124 - 2013-05-21
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97124 - 2013-05-21
CA Blank Order
on July 15, 2011, granting seventy-five days of sentence credit but denying 362 days of sentence credit.[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96330 - 2013-05-07
on July 15, 2011, granting seventy-five days of sentence credit but denying 362 days of sentence credit.[1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96330 - 2013-05-07
[PDF]
Randy Joseph Mann v. Louise Marie Mann
, this court has no jurisdiction to review the divorce judgment. See RULE 809.10(1)(b), STATS. Louise has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10010 - 2017-09-19
, this court has no jurisdiction to review the divorce judgment. See RULE 809.10(1)(b), STATS. Louise has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10010 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel provided Grigsby with a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132987 - 2017-09-21
) 1 and Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel provided Grigsby with a copy
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132987 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel filed no-merit reports pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2023-24)1 and Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011416 - 2025-09-17
counsel filed no-merit reports pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2023-24)1 and Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011416 - 2025-09-17
Lori L. Johansen v. William J. Johansen
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Johansen appeals an order denying his post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18998 - 2005-07-13
and Higginbotham, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Johansen appeals an order denying his post
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18998 - 2005-07-13
Kim R. Smith v. Barbara J. Eastridge
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kim Smith appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15429 - 2005-03-31
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Kim Smith appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15429 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Demajor Rogers, Jr., appeals a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53420 - 2014-09-15
and Kessler, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. William Demajor Rogers, Jr., appeals a judgment convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53420 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2017-18),1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241769 - 2019-06-04
appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2017-18),1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241769 - 2019-06-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20)1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378308 - 2021-06-17
a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT. RULE 809.32 (2019-20)1 and Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=378308 - 2021-06-17