Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7391 - 7400 of 63187 for records.
Search results 7391 - 7400 of 63187 for records.
State v. Daniel J. Luedke
the lawyer to reiterate what was explained to the defendant; or (3) by expressly referring to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3010 - 2005-03-31
the lawyer to reiterate what was explained to the defendant; or (3) by expressly referring to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3010 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. Podgorski was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104262 - 2013-11-10
. Podgorski was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104262 - 2013-11-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2012AP2595 2 conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101156 - 2017-09-21
our review of the briefs and record, we No. 2012AP2595 2 conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177102 - 2017-09-21
a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177102 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94034 - 2013-03-10
. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94034 - 2013-03-10
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98828 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98828 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
the consecutive sentences. We concluded, upon independent review of the record, that further appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35943 - 2009-03-23
the consecutive sentences. We concluded, upon independent review of the record, that further appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35943 - 2009-03-23
CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102281 - 2013-09-22
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102281 - 2013-09-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154326 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154326 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
2 the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997634 - 2025-08-20
2 the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997634 - 2025-08-20