Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 73931 - 73940 of 83832 for simple case search.
Search results 73931 - 73940 of 83832 for simple case search.
State v. Jonathan Liebzeit
, and the case would be returned to the jury for more deliberations. Liebzeit argues that the jury’s questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
, and the case would be returned to the jury for more deliberations. Liebzeit argues that the jury’s questions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13888 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[2] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2013-14).[2] We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142690 - 2015-06-02
State v. David T.O.
of review for waiver cases. Whether to waive a child into adult court is discretionary with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
of review for waiver cases. Whether to waive a child into adult court is discretionary with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10741 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605765 - 2022-12-29
report sets forth the procedural history of the case and addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=605765 - 2022-12-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶5 In this case, deputy Graf was enforcing WIS. STAT. § 940.09 when he requested a sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47939 - 2014-09-15
. ¶5 In this case, deputy Graf was enforcing WIS. STAT. § 940.09 when he requested a sample
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47939 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Randy O'Neill v. James Reemer
). 1 We affirm. ¶2 This case has been the subject of previous appellate litigation. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21
). 1 We affirm. ¶2 This case has been the subject of previous appellate litigation. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17786 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Navneet Luthar v. Kamini Luthar
the factors described in WIS. STAT. § 767.26 (1999- 2000).2 The court in this case awarded Kamini monthly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2429 - 2017-09-19
the factors described in WIS. STAT. § 767.26 (1999- 2000).2 The court in this case awarded Kamini monthly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2429 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. The court specifically explained that the sentence appropriately addressed the offense in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
. The court specifically explained that the sentence appropriately addressed the offense in this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95889 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Timothy A. Knight
. 3 We agree with the trial court’s observation that in a different case the end of the intensive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15411 - 2017-09-21
. 3 We agree with the trial court’s observation that in a different case the end of the intensive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15411 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
factors in light of the facts of this case and addressed them at length in its sentencing decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241516 - 2019-05-30
factors in light of the facts of this case and addressed them at length in its sentencing decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=241516 - 2019-05-30