Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 63681 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 741 - 750 of 63681 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: KIMBERLY C. HYING, JOINT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83029 - 2014-09-15
IN COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT I IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: KIMBERLY C. HYING, JOINT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83029 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
In re the marriage of: Kimberly C. Hying, Joint-Petitioner-Respondent, v. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83029 - 2012-05-29
In re the marriage of: Kimberly C. Hying, Joint-Petitioner-Respondent, v. Martin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83029 - 2012-05-29
Charlotte Gadzinski v. Gerald Gadzinski
joint legal custody of their teenaged daughter, who resided primarily with Gerald. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8447 - 2005-03-31
joint legal custody of their teenaged daughter, who resided primarily with Gerald. At the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8447 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 121
ANDERSON, P.J. Benjamin D. Tarrant appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37309 - 2014-09-15
ANDERSON, P.J. Benjamin D. Tarrant appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37309 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 121
ANDERSON, P.J. Benjamin D. Tarrant appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37309 - 2009-08-25
ANDERSON, P.J. Benjamin D. Tarrant appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37309 - 2009-08-25
Shawn N. v. Tammy N.
presumption exists.[2] There is a statutory presumption of joint legal custody, Wis. Stat. § 767.24(2)(am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3308 - 2005-03-31
presumption exists.[2] There is a statutory presumption of joint legal custody, Wis. Stat. § 767.24(2)(am
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3308 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Shawn N. v. Tammy N.
There is a statutory presumption of joint legal custody, WIS. STAT. § 767.24(2)(am) (1999-2000).3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3308 - 2017-09-19
There is a statutory presumption of joint legal custody, WIS. STAT. § 767.24(2)(am) (1999-2000).3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3308 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 50
and proper persons to have legal custody of the children. The judgment ordered joint custody with primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28184 - 2014-09-15
and proper persons to have legal custody of the children. The judgment ordered joint custody with primary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28184 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 50
custody of the children. The judgment ordered joint custody with primary placement to Mary Jo. Eugene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28184 - 2007-03-27
custody of the children. The judgment ordered joint custody with primary placement to Mary Jo. Eugene
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28184 - 2007-03-27
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. Mandelman
malpractice case against her former attorney, John Dade, who had represented N.C. in a custody dispute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25168 - 2017-09-21
malpractice case against her former attorney, John Dade, who had represented N.C. in a custody dispute
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25168 - 2017-09-21