Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 4343 for bd.

Everett Carlson v. Oconto County Board of Canvassers
Election Bd., 589 P.2d 224, 228 (Okla. 1979). The result of an election is sufficiently uncertain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2765 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 230
988722 (Envtl. App. Bd. 2001), available at http://www.epa.gov/eab/disk11/lvi.pdf. The “clarifications
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26961 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
view of the evidence for that of the zoning authority. See Clark v. Waupaca Cnty. Bd. of Adj., 186
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98639 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Everett Carlson v. Oconto County Board of Canvassers
is impossible to determine with mathematical certainty. See Helm v. State Election Bd., 589 P.2d 224, 228
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2765 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Ruven Seibert
. Boundary Appeal Bd., 202 Wis.2d 214, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96, 98 (1996). In an attempt to identify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12970 - 2017-09-21

Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
to undisputed facts. We review this question of law de novo. See State ex rel. Blum v. Bd. of Educ., 209 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13278 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WTMJ, Inc. v. Michael J. Sullivan
. Oshkosh Library Bd., 125 Wis.2d 480, 485, 373 N.W.2d 459, 463 (Ct. App. 1985). The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10213 - 2017-09-20

State v. Ruven Seibert
. See Stockbridge Sch. Dist. v. DPI Sch. Dist. Boundary Appeal Bd., 202 Wis.2d 214, 219, 550 N.W.2d 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12970 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Ziervogel v. Wash. Cty. Bd. of Adjustment, 2004 WI 23, ¶13, 269 Wis. 2d 549, 676 N.W.2d 401. ¶7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170700 - 2017-09-21

WTMJ, Inc. v. Michael J. Sullivan
enough to successfully withhold a record. Oshkosh Northwestern Co. v. Oshkosh Library Bd., 125 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10213 - 2005-03-31