Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 30164 for de.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, WI 53140 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344217 - 2021-03-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Services appeals. ¶6 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110892 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
Kasprzak then filed a request for de novo review. The circuit court agreed with the small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68127 - 2011-07-19

Sammy J. Gates v. Gary R. McCaughtry
¶8 We review the granting and denial of motions for summary judgment de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5983 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
failed to appear, for $1,529 plus costs.4 Karademas requested de novo review by the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006652 - 2025-09-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for de novo review. The circuit court agreed with the small claims court that governmental immunity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=68127 - 2014-09-15

The Kraemer Company, LLC v. Pierce County Board of Adjustment
.” Des Jardin v. Town of Greenfield, 262 Wis. 43, 47-48, 53 N.W.2d 784 (1952). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21221 - 2006-02-06

[PDF] Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
is de novo. State ex rel. Hippler v. City of Baraboo, 47 Wis.2d 603, 616, 178 N.W.2d 1, 8 (1970
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14174 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
on, R[oh]de would have had an opportunity to see the emergency vehicle, recognize what it was and what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118087 - 2014-07-28

Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
review, our standard of review of the circuit court decision is de novo. State ex rel. Hippler v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31