Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 30059 for de.
Search results 741 - 750 of 30059 for de.
The Kraemer Company, LLC v. Pierce County Board of Adjustment
.” Des Jardin v. Town of Greenfield, 262 Wis. 43, 47-48, 53 N.W.2d 784 (1952). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21221 - 2006-02-06
.” Des Jardin v. Town of Greenfield, 262 Wis. 43, 47-48, 53 N.W.2d 784 (1952). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21221 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Services appeals. ¶6 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110892 - 2017-09-21
Services appeals. ¶6 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110892 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. Leasing Services appeals. ¶6 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110892 - 2014-04-29
. Leasing Services appeals. ¶6 We review de novo the grant of summary judgment, employing the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110892 - 2014-04-29
COURT OF APPEALS
Kasprzak then filed a request for de novo review. The circuit court agreed with the small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68127 - 2011-07-19
Kasprzak then filed a request for de novo review. The circuit court agreed with the small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68127 - 2011-07-19
Amjad Tufail v. The Furniture Clearance Center (Division of Porter Furniture Center)
appeals from a circuit court order dismissing as untimely his request for a de novo hearing of his small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6381 - 2005-03-31
appeals from a circuit court order dismissing as untimely his request for a de novo hearing of his small
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6381 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, WI 53140 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344217 - 2021-03-10
, WI 53140 Marcella De Peters Law Office of Marcella De Peters PMB #318 6650 W. State Street
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=344217 - 2021-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS
on, R[oh]de would have had an opportunity to see the emergency vehicle, recognize what it was and what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118087 - 2014-07-28
on, R[oh]de would have had an opportunity to see the emergency vehicle, recognize what it was and what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118087 - 2014-07-28
[PDF]
City of Kenosha v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
deference and de novo review. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57 (1996). Which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15596 - 2017-09-21
deference and de novo review. See UFE Inc. v. LIRC, 201 Wis. 2d 274, 284, 548 N.W.2d 57 (1996). Which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15596 - 2017-09-21
Hoey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Polk County Board of Adjustment
review, our standard of review of the circuit court decision is de novo. State ex rel. Hippler v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31
review, our standard of review of the circuit court decision is de novo. State ex rel. Hippler v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
BY DINORA OTERO DE CASTILLO, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR, AND DINORA OTERO DE CASTILLO, INDIVIDUALLY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780614 - 2024-03-26
BY DINORA OTERO DE CASTILLO, SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR, AND DINORA OTERO DE CASTILLO, INDIVIDUALLY
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=780614 - 2024-03-26