Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 2567 for dnr.

COURT OF APPEALS
concession that the State is correct. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70202 - 2011-08-24

[PDF] James R. Schultz v. Gerald Berge
the scope of that exception and, as a result, principles of equitable estoppel were applicable to the DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11567 - 2017-09-19

Fred Myer v. City of Westby
. ¶7 In 1977, the DNR issued a permit to the City to allow continuous discharge of effluent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2214 - 2005-03-31

James R. Schultz v. Gerald Berge
applicable to the DNR. Id. at 210-11, 291 N.W.2d at 515-16. The court then stated that, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11567 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Fred Myer v. City of Westby
of the easement. ¶7 In 1977, the DNR issued a permit to the City to allow continuous discharge of effluent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2214 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lori Kaiser v. Village of Hartland
of the easement is the actual wetland boundary as determined by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14473 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] October 29, 2012
to a DNR permit, is the District deprived of immunity under Wis. Stat. § 893.80(4) for its discretionary
/sc/sccase/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88838 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994) (matters not refuted in reply brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107791 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
, and affirm on that basis. See Schlieper v. DNR, 188 Wis. 2d 318, 322, 525 N.W.2d 99 (Ct. App. 1994) (we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149702 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Paul J. May v. Pecatonica Rail Transit Commission
compliance standard. Id. Both sections apply whether the relief sought is equitable or monetary. DNR v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9188 - 2017-09-19