Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 12458 for mr.
Search results 741 - 750 of 12458 for mr.
State v. Thomas A. Greve
had been reached. MR. LETTENBERGER: Good morning, Your Honor. Attorney Frank Lettenberger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3995 - 2005-03-31
had been reached. MR. LETTENBERGER: Good morning, Your Honor. Attorney Frank Lettenberger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3995 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. We affirm. I. ¶2 Mr. Kotecki was married to Linda Kotecki for twenty-five years. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43962 - 2009-11-30
. We affirm. I. ¶2 Mr. Kotecki was married to Linda Kotecki for twenty-five years. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43962 - 2009-11-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and reasoning in part as follows: Mr. Froebel could have best been described as being confrontational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238786 - 2019-04-10
and reasoning in part as follows: Mr. Froebel could have best been described as being confrontational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238786 - 2019-04-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
. We affirm. I. ¶2 Mr. Kotecki was married to Linda Kotecki for twenty-five years. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43962 - 2014-09-15
. We affirm. I. ¶2 Mr. Kotecki was married to Linda Kotecki for twenty-five years. After
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43962 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Larry A. Tiepelman
part: The State and Mr. Tiepelman have already concurred on the principal issue in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25474 - 2017-09-21
part: The State and Mr. Tiepelman have already concurred on the principal issue in this case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25474 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable: [t]here is evidence in the record to sustain the [C]ommission’s judgment that Mr. Doty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196844 - 2017-09-26
reasonable: [t]here is evidence in the record to sustain the [C]ommission’s judgment that Mr. Doty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196844 - 2017-09-26
Kenneth Urman v. Brian Barron
evidence of intoxication of the defendant, Brian Barron. The testimony indicated that Mr. Barron consumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4176 - 2005-03-31
evidence of intoxication of the defendant, Brian Barron. The testimony indicated that Mr. Barron consumed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4176 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harry L. Seymer
decision: No. 2004AP552-CR 4 THE COURT: Mr. Seymer, where are we going with this? MR. SEYMER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17655 - 2017-09-21
decision: No. 2004AP552-CR 4 THE COURT: Mr. Seymer, where are we going with this? MR. SEYMER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17655 - 2017-09-21
State v. Harry L. Seymer
. The following exchange explains the trial court’s decision: THE COURT: Mr. Seymer, where are we going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
. The following exchange explains the trial court’s decision: THE COURT: Mr. Seymer, where are we going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17655 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
WI APP 83
. It ordered that “in lieu of discharge, Mr. Miller will serve a 90 working-day unpaid suspension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177487 - 2017-09-21
. It ordered that “in lieu of discharge, Mr. Miller will serve a 90 working-day unpaid suspension
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177487 - 2017-09-21