Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 741 - 750 of 2418 for ny.
Search results 741 - 750 of 2418 for ny.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
it applied “both the preponderance and the clear and convincing standards,” thus, “[a]ny application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542371 - 2022-07-12
it applied “both the preponderance and the clear and convincing standards,” thus, “[a]ny application
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=542371 - 2022-07-12
[PDF]
NOTICE
.”). 3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 100.20(5) provides that: [a]ny person suffering pecuniary loss because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39034 - 2014-09-15
.”). 3 WISCONSIN STAT. § 100.20(5) provides that: [a]ny person suffering pecuniary loss because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39034 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the intimidation of a witness charge with the initials “NY” written near the top. Yang acknowledged that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228078 - 2018-11-28
for the intimidation of a witness charge with the initials “NY” written near the top. Yang acknowledged that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228078 - 2018-11-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 6 “Harmful material” is defined in the statute as “[a]ny picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258440 - 2020-04-22
). 6 “Harmful material” is defined in the statute as “[a]ny picture, photograph, drawing, sculpture
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258440 - 2020-04-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
omitted)). “[A]ny fact that was known to the court at the time of sentencing does not constitute a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532036 - 2022-06-14
omitted)). “[A]ny fact that was known to the court at the time of sentencing does not constitute a new
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=532036 - 2022-06-14
[PDF]
State v. April O.
for excluding “[a]ny period of delay caused by the disqualification of a judge.” The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16017 - 2017-09-21
for excluding “[a]ny period of delay caused by the disqualification of a judge.” The State contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16017 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶15 “Recreational activity” is defined under Wis. Stat. § 895.52(1)(g) as: [A]ny outdoor activity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138329 - 2015-03-25
.” ¶15 “Recreational activity” is defined under Wis. Stat. § 895.52(1)(g) as: [A]ny outdoor activity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138329 - 2015-03-25
[PDF]
State v. Scott T. Bidwell
weapon” as: [A]ny firearm, whether loaded or unloaded; any device designed as a weapon and capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
weapon” as: [A]ny firearm, whether loaded or unloaded; any device designed as a weapon and capable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8802 - 2017-09-19
State v. April O.
“[a]ny period of delay caused by the disqualification of a judge.” The State contends that April’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16017 - 2005-03-31
“[a]ny period of delay caused by the disqualification of a judge.” The State contends that April’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16017 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as depicted in the photographs; however, the court was concerned about the officer’s head injury. “[A]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08
, as depicted in the photographs; however, the court was concerned about the officer’s head injury. “[A]ny
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=798450 - 2024-05-08