Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7401 - 7410 of 58593 for speedy trial.
Search results 7401 - 7410 of 58593 for speedy trial.
Clayton Fox v. Terry Kalberg
BROWN, J.[1] This is a review of trial court orders denying a motion to vacate a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4962 - 2005-03-31
BROWN, J.[1] This is a review of trial court orders denying a motion to vacate a default judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4962 - 2005-03-31
James Wiechmann v. Colin Ilsley
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8111 - 2005-03-31
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8111 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Robert Peaslee v. David Peaslee
and Karen Peaslee (David). They argue that the trial court placed improper restrictions on the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2212 - 2017-09-19
and Karen Peaslee (David). They argue that the trial court placed improper restrictions on the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Ralph Axelson
denying his § 974.06, STATS., motion for postconviction relief. The trial court held that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
denying his § 974.06, STATS., motion for postconviction relief. The trial court held that all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8296 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffery R. Janda
of an intoxicant. See Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends that the trial court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7637 - 2005-03-31
of an intoxicant. See Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). He contends that the trial court erroneously denied his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7637 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James Wiechmann v. Colin Ilsley
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8111 - 2017-09-19
for our review—whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by granting Schreiber's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8111 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel A. Lindell
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2001-02). 1 Lindell claims that the trial court was biased against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5211 - 2017-09-19
WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2001-02). 1 Lindell claims that the trial court was biased against him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5211 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Anthony D. Turner
contends that he received ineffective assistance from trial counsel. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12893 - 2017-09-21
contends that he received ineffective assistance from trial counsel. We conclude that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12893 - 2017-09-21
Robert Peaslee v. David Peaslee
by David Peaslee and Karen Peaslee (David). They argue that the trial court placed improper restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2212 - 2005-03-31
by David Peaslee and Karen Peaslee (David). They argue that the trial court placed improper restrictions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2212 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Vanessa Henningfield v. Judith Fischer
was excessive. We conclude that the trial court’s award was a proper exercise of its discretion and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14813 - 2017-09-21
was excessive. We conclude that the trial court’s award was a proper exercise of its discretion and therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14813 - 2017-09-21