Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74021 - 74030 of 84023 for simple case search.
Search results 74021 - 74030 of 84023 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to his presentence custody in Wisconsin. Id. Even the primary case Drexler relies upon, State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186592 - 2017-09-21
to his presentence custody in Wisconsin. Id. Even the primary case Drexler relies upon, State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186592 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Marschke
of mental illness and memory problems unrelated to this case, that he was a good father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2513 - 2017-09-19
of mental illness and memory problems unrelated to this case, that he was a good father
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2513 - 2017-09-19
State v. Carl E. Cunningham
performed ineffectively by failing to adequately investigate his case and to argue that Cunningham’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6654 - 2005-03-31
performed ineffectively by failing to adequately investigate his case and to argue that Cunningham’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6654 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111217 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111217 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
issue is not currently preserved for appellate review in this case because no postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135244 - 2017-09-21
issue is not currently preserved for appellate review in this case because no postconviction motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135244 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the case. As we explained in our order dated March 2, 2018, a defendant has an obligation to cooperate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215570 - 2018-07-11
of the case. As we explained in our order dated March 2, 2018, a defendant has an obligation to cooperate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215570 - 2018-07-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572098 - 2022-09-29
-CR 2 our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572098 - 2022-09-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the form of a violation of the standard of care. ¶5 Perzynski further argues that in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30419 - 2014-09-15
in the form of a violation of the standard of care. ¶5 Perzynski further argues that in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30419 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
by deciding this case without ordering the certiorari record from the agency. Because the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
by deciding this case without ordering the certiorari record from the agency. Because the claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84440 - 2012-07-04
Larry George v. Grace Brown
from two orders dismissing his petitions for writs of mandamus in two public records cases.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7813 - 2005-03-31
from two orders dismissing his petitions for writs of mandamus in two public records cases.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7813 - 2005-03-31