Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7411 - 7420 of 68466 for did.
Search results 7411 - 7420 of 68466 for did.
State v. Joan Schmitz
, but no one could definitely say they did so. There was no evidence of any physical contact. The courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
, but no one could definitely say they did so. There was no evidence of any physical contact. The courtroom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16324 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Otila Trevino v. City of Milwaukee
- binding on her as it did not meet the requirements of § 807.05, STATS.1 She also argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8265 - 2017-09-19
- binding on her as it did not meet the requirements of § 807.05, STATS.1 She also argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8265 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel did not raise in a petition for review the argument that the investigatory stop was illegal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28298 - 2014-09-15
counsel did not raise in a petition for review the argument that the investigatory stop was illegal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28298 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
sitting in his car in a parking lot. The officer did not believe that Palermo had committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27398 - 2014-09-15
sitting in his car in a parking lot. The officer did not believe that Palermo had committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27398 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 6, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court of...
did not raise in a petition for review the argument that the investigatory stop was illegal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28298 - 2007-03-05
did not raise in a petition for review the argument that the investigatory stop was illegal. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28298 - 2007-03-05
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Marcus
-0105-CR 2 incomplete and that he did not have sufficient time to review the PSI before sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3492 - 2017-09-20
-0105-CR 2 incomplete and that he did not have sufficient time to review the PSI before sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3492 - 2017-09-20
Otila Trevino v. City of Milwaukee
on her as it did not meet the requirements of § 807.05, Stats.[1] She also argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8265 - 2005-03-31
on her as it did not meet the requirements of § 807.05, Stats.[1] She also argues that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8265 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Eugene C. Lee
shocked the hearer as it once did. The court did conclude, however, that the statement had limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3081 - 2017-09-20
shocked the hearer as it once did. The court did conclude, however, that the statement had limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3081 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Derrick Stewart
). Prosecution witnesses Wurtz and Daley testified at the postconviction hearing that they either did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
). Prosecution witnesses Wurtz and Daley testified at the postconviction hearing that they either did not see
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11970 - 2017-09-21
Paula Lucas v. Delano E. Lucas
court did not address whether there had been a substantial change in circumstances before modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6830 - 2005-03-31
court did not address whether there had been a substantial change in circumstances before modifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6830 - 2005-03-31