Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7411 - 7420 of 50036 for our.

COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶5 Our supreme court requires convicted defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98457 - 2013-06-24

State v. Willie C. Fondren
, however, presents an issue for the trial court’s discretionary determination, subject to our review under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3948 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
filing the petition to revoke his supervised release. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207720 - 2018-01-25

[PDF] CA Blank Order
lifetime imprisonment as a persistent repeater. Our review of the appellate record satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581727 - 2022-10-26

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Murphy was sent a copy of the report, and has not filed a response. Upon our independent review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232044 - 2019-01-17

State v. Gordon Hammer
offenses. Hammer’s reliance on the facts in Manson is misplaced. In Manson, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11618 - 2005-03-31

State v. Aaron S.W.
subjective standard, or even by our own sense of what might be a "right" or "wrong" decision in the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11615 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
sufficiency of the evidence for each count. Our standard of review is whether the evidence, viewed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204733 - 2017-12-13

[PDF] State v. Wandell Lee
.” Id. (emphasis added). ¶8 Recently, our court had occasion to visit Jackson’s holding in State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26213 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
246, 260, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986). Our review of the record and of counsel’s analysis in the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=823763 - 2024-07-10