Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7411 - 7420 of 72987 for we.
Search results 7411 - 7420 of 72987 for we.
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to meet the standards outlined in § 974.07. We affirm. ¶2 This is the sixth time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89014 - 2012-11-05
failed to meet the standards outlined in § 974.07. We affirm. ¶2 This is the sixth time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89014 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
WI APP 224
. We hold that this prosecution is not barred by the law of double jeopardy or claim and issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30317 - 2014-09-15
. We hold that this prosecution is not barred by the law of double jeopardy or claim and issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30317 - 2014-09-15
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Reinaldo R.P.
for the child’s return within a year of the TPR disposition. We find none of these arguments persuasive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
for the child’s return within a year of the TPR disposition. We find none of these arguments persuasive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Warren
Warren requested a new attorney on the day of the trial before denying his request. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
Warren requested a new attorney on the day of the trial before denying his request. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony James Daniels
in denying his postconviction motion without first having held an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10370 - 2017-09-20
in denying his postconviction motion without first having held an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10370 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and intelligent. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210453 - 2018-03-28
, and intelligent. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210453 - 2018-03-28
[PDF]
Susan K. Defoe v. Jodi L. Sigrist
, and that the court failed to consider her indigent status when it refused to waive the transcription fee. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4938 - 2017-09-19
, and that the court failed to consider her indigent status when it refused to waive the transcription fee. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4938 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
.” We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At all material time periods, DeBruin was a licensed Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78530 - 2012-02-22
.” We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 At all material time periods, DeBruin was a licensed Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=78530 - 2012-02-22
Kathleen Hansen & Associates v. Gerald J. Kallas
of attorney’s fees that the trial court awarded to Kallas was unreasonable. We disagree and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6077 - 2005-03-31
of attorney’s fees that the trial court awarded to Kallas was unreasonable. We disagree and affirm the order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6077 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Alice C. Ketter
of the waste tires from her property. We conclude that Alice received constructive, if not actual, notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10621 - 2017-09-20
of the waste tires from her property. We conclude that Alice received constructive, if not actual, notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10621 - 2017-09-20