Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7411 - 7420 of 72987 for we.
Search results 7411 - 7420 of 72987 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for plea withdrawal. In Brown’s previous appeal, we remanded for an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111459 - 2017-09-21
motion for plea withdrawal. In Brown’s previous appeal, we remanded for an evidentiary hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111459 - 2017-09-21
State v. Anthony James Daniels
erred in denying his postconviction motion without first having held an evidentiary hearing. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10370 - 2005-03-31
erred in denying his postconviction motion without first having held an evidentiary hearing. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10370 - 2005-03-31
Frank P. Holzberger v. Evelyn C. Holzberger
of Understanding, it is simply an “agreement to agree,” which is not enforceable in Wisconsin. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18537 - 2005-06-13
of Understanding, it is simply an “agreement to agree,” which is not enforceable in Wisconsin. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18537 - 2005-06-13
COURT OF APPEALS
failed to meet the standards outlined in § 974.07. We affirm. ¶2 This is the sixth time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89014 - 2012-11-05
failed to meet the standards outlined in § 974.07. We affirm. ¶2 This is the sixth time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89014 - 2012-11-05
[PDF]
WI APP 224
. We hold that this prosecution is not barred by the law of double jeopardy or claim and issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30317 - 2014-09-15
. We hold that this prosecution is not barred by the law of double jeopardy or claim and issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30317 - 2014-09-15
Dane County Department of Human Services v. Reinaldo R.P.
for the child’s return within a year of the TPR disposition. We find none of these arguments persuasive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
for the child’s return within a year of the TPR disposition. We find none of these arguments persuasive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3666 - 2005-03-31
State v. John Warren
Warren requested a new attorney on the day of the trial before denying his request. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
Warren requested a new attorney on the day of the trial before denying his request. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Anthony James Daniels
in denying his postconviction motion without first having held an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10370 - 2017-09-20
in denying his postconviction motion without first having held an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10370 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and intelligent. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210453 - 2018-03-28
, and intelligent. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210453 - 2018-03-28
[PDF]
Susan K. Defoe v. Jodi L. Sigrist
, and that the court failed to consider her indigent status when it refused to waive the transcription fee. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4938 - 2017-09-19
, and that the court failed to consider her indigent status when it refused to waive the transcription fee. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4938 - 2017-09-19