Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74111 - 74120 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
Search results 74111 - 74120 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment. ¶3 Hanson subsequently filed several pro se motions for postconviction relief. In 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85754 - 2012-08-06
the judgment. ¶3 Hanson subsequently filed several pro se motions for postconviction relief. In 2007
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85754 - 2012-08-06
COURT OF APPEALS
merit, but he did not respond. We accepted the no-merit report and affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58005 - 2010-12-20
merit, but he did not respond. We accepted the no-merit report and affirmed the judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58005 - 2010-12-20
[PDF]
State v. Glenn Eric Rhodes
to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14158 - 2014-09-15
to the offense committed as to shock public sentiment and violate the judgment of reasonable people concerning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14158 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney Pamela
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205916 - 2017-12-19
that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that attorney Pamela
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205916 - 2017-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2025AP908-CRNM 4 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1158407 - 2026-08-13
2025AP908-CRNM 4 Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgments of conviction are summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1158407 - 2026-08-13
[PDF]
Tony G. Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
. Co., 204 Wis. 2d 231, 235, 554 N.W.2d 232 (1996) (“Under claim preclusion, a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19470 - 2017-09-21
. Co., 204 Wis. 2d 231, 235, 554 N.W.2d 232 (1996) (“Under claim preclusion, a final judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19470 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment against the defendant and permit the defendant to withdraw the plea and enter another plea. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
judgment against the defendant and permit the defendant to withdraw the plea and enter another plea. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30675 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92740 - 2014-09-15
of the record discloses no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92740 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
the judgment of conviction or modify his sentence. That motion was denied, as was Blalock’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31352 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction or modify his sentence. That motion was denied, as was Blalock’s motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31352 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to some aspect of his judgment of conviction. As the supreme court has stated, “[w]e need finality in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28957 - 2007-06-26
to some aspect of his judgment of conviction. As the supreme court has stated, “[w]e need finality in our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28957 - 2007-06-26