Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74121 - 74130 of 78121 for restraining orders.
Search results 74121 - 74130 of 78121 for restraining orders.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from an investigative stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956833 - 2025-05-15
order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained from an investigative stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956833 - 2025-05-15
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that we should exercise our discretion to reverse the judgment and order a new trial. We may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35146 - 2009-01-12
argues that we should exercise our discretion to reverse the judgment and order a new trial. We may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35146 - 2009-01-12
COURT OF APPEALS
was in pretrial discovery, the supreme court issued Order 03-06 on March 31, 2005, changing the rules governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
was in pretrial discovery, the supreme court issued Order 03-06 on March 31, 2005, changing the rules governing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32016 - 2008-03-05
State v. James E. Ganey
this conduct in order to determine what sentence was appropriate. Such consideration was relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2005-03-31
this conduct in order to determine what sentence was appropriate. Such consideration was relevant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11984 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bernhardt C. Thompson
under § 973.12(1), Stats., in order to prove a defendant’s conviction. The use of such a report depends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
under § 973.12(1), Stats., in order to prove a defendant’s conviction. The use of such a report depends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15441 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Milwaukee v. Earl Meredith
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 356.63(1)(b). He challenges the order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15856 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to WIS. STAT. § 356.63(1)(b). He challenges the order denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15856 - 2017-09-21
Donald R. MacClymont v. Harriet J. Gilligan
of ch. 706 do not restrict the remedies the court may order, particularly here where the real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8768 - 2005-03-31
of ch. 706 do not restrict the remedies the court may order, particularly here where the real estate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8768 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jack R. Martinsen
found Martinsen to be a sexually violent person, and ordered institutional care in a secure medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
found Martinsen to be a sexually violent person, and ordered institutional care in a secure medical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11605 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Richard D. Herr v. Janet M. Herr
discovery before the hearing, Janet was not prejudiced. An order denying a motion for relief under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9114 - 2017-09-19
discovery before the hearing, Janet was not prejudiced. An order denying a motion for relief under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9114 - 2017-09-19
City of Milwaukee v. Earl Meredith
). He challenges the order denying his motion to suppress this evidence, where he argued that the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15856 - 2005-03-31
). He challenges the order denying his motion to suppress this evidence, where he argued that the police
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15856 - 2005-03-31