Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74171 - 74180 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
Search results 74171 - 74180 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
COURT OF APPEALS
court to amend the judgment of conviction or modify his sentence. That motion was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31352 - 2008-01-07
court to amend the judgment of conviction or modify his sentence. That motion was denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31352 - 2008-01-07
CA Blank Order
judgments convicting him of operating while intoxicated (OWI) as a twelfth offense and operating after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139093 - 2015-04-07
judgments convicting him of operating while intoxicated (OWI) as a twelfth offense and operating after
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139093 - 2015-04-07
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2012AP2213-CRNM 4 IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92739 - 2014-09-15
. No. 2012AP2213-CRNM 4 IT IS ORDERED that the judgment is summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92739 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not participated in the robberies.[1] On direct appeal, this court affirmed the judgment and postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35277 - 2009-01-20
not participated in the robberies.[1] On direct appeal, this court affirmed the judgment and postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35277 - 2009-01-20
Charles Britton v. Bonny Britton
At the time of the initial divorce judgment, the parties stipulated that Charles could not afford to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4517 - 2005-03-31
At the time of the initial divorce judgment, the parties stipulated that Charles could not afford to pay
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4517 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment was entered on October 6, 2014. Sheedy’s failure to request a hearing was deemed a no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
judgment was entered on October 6, 2014. Sheedy’s failure to request a hearing was deemed a no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Statutes are to the 2015-16 version unless otherwise noted. 2 The judgment of conviction reflects eight
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204677 - 2017-12-06
Statutes are to the 2015-16 version unless otherwise noted. 2 The judgment of conviction reflects eight
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=204677 - 2017-12-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of review largely dictates resolution of this appeal. We may “not substitute [our] judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149106 - 2017-09-21
of review largely dictates resolution of this appeal. We may “not substitute [our] judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149106 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
prevents using a motion for reconsideration to extend the time to appeal from a judgment or order. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28526 - 2014-09-15
prevents using a motion for reconsideration to extend the time to appeal from a judgment or order. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28526 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2025AP202-CRNM 4 IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1145265 - 2026-07-14
. No. 2025AP202-CRNM 4 IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1145265 - 2026-07-14