Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7421 - 7430 of 68502 for did.
Search results 7421 - 7430 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
rights to Alicia A. She argues that because the State did not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92968 - 2014-09-15
rights to Alicia A. She argues that because the State did not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92968 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Public Defender to see if it would appoint successor counsel. ¶3 The circuit court did not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651725 - 2023-05-03
Public Defender to see if it would appoint successor counsel. ¶3 The circuit court did not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651725 - 2023-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
that the error was harmless. For the reasons we explain below, we also conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
that the error was harmless. For the reasons we explain below, we also conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
COURT OF APPEALS
)(b). His sole claim on appeal is that the circuit court erred when it did not grant his suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
)(b). His sole claim on appeal is that the circuit court erred when it did not grant his suppression
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98666 - 2013-07-01
[PDF]
Matthew Damm v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
trial. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13623 - 2017-09-21
trial. We conclude that the trial court did not erroneously exercise its discretion in excluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13623 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
when it did not grant his suppression motion.1 We affirm. I. ¶2 On June 16, 2008, just before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
when it did not grant his suppression motion.1 We affirm. I. ¶2 On June 16, 2008, just before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98666 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
. Patrick Affeldt appeals from the judgment and order, which did the following: (1) awarded him limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21
. Patrick Affeldt appeals from the judgment and order, which did the following: (1) awarded him limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12307 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patrick D. Affeldt v. Yehuda Elmakias
. Patrick Affeldt appeals from the judgment and order, which did the following: (1) awarded him limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12656 - 2017-09-21
. Patrick Affeldt appeals from the judgment and order, which did the following: (1) awarded him limited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. that a separate dispositional hearing was necessary, but did not order or conduct such a No. 2018AP1150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236856 - 2019-03-07
. that a separate dispositional hearing was necessary, but did not order or conduct such a No. 2018AP1150
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=236856 - 2019-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for the subdivision described a “perpetual right of way” over all of the lots but did not indicate where the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21
for the subdivision described a “perpetual right of way” over all of the lots but did not indicate where the right
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177794 - 2017-09-21