Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7421 - 7430 of 50107 for our.
Search results 7421 - 7430 of 50107 for our.
State v. Patricia E. K.
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534980 - 2022-06-22
supervision. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=534980 - 2022-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Bryant E. Carter
N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4960 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4960 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
extension is the, in our view I guess, is continuing the status quo is the best way to ensure that those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
extension is the, in our view I guess, is continuing the status quo is the best way to ensure that those
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40576 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of [the witness’s] credibility.” Id. ¶10 The State also directs our attention to People v. Olguin, 37 Cal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85278 - 2014-09-15
of [the witness’s] credibility.” Id. ¶10 The State also directs our attention to People v. Olguin, 37 Cal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85278 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Before discussing the merits of this appeal, we observe that in his response brief Koch violates our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
Before discussing the merits of this appeal, we observe that in his response brief Koch violates our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123528 - 2014-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
amendment approved by Winnebago County (the “County”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078658 - 2026-02-18
amendment approved by Winnebago County (the “County”). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078658 - 2026-02-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Based on our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103550 - 2017-09-21
a response. Based on our independent review of the no-merit report and the record, this court concludes
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103550 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary L. Janda
in Janda’s appendix. In our independent review of the record, we concluded that the criminal records were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2387 - 2005-03-31
in Janda’s appendix. In our independent review of the record, we concluded that the criminal records were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2387 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
(EDR) motions to dismiss Kottwitz’s counterclaim and for summary judgment. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17
(EDR) motions to dismiss Kottwitz’s counterclaim and for summary judgment. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1051072 - 2025-12-17