Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74221 - 74230 of 74688 for public records.

[PDF] Michael F. Johnson v. Amanda A. Ziegler
concluding that, based on the undisputed facts contained in the summary judgment record, DEC’s recovery
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3448 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Lynne S. Ayres v. John D. Ayres
was attributable to John’s efforts at AMI. The record, however, does not support Lynne’s contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14849 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Law Offices of Alan D. Eisenberg v. Barry Healthcare Services, Inc.
fees to Barry Healthcare as sanctions against the appellant. The record reflects that in awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2413 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Glenn E. Davis
expert opinion. This later statement was not part of our record. We confined ourselves
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3197 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. John S. Cooper
assistance by choosing not to object to the police officer’s comment. ¶21 Our review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5587 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the Town conducted surveying and planning and reviewed records, “yet negligently missed the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253986 - 2020-02-13

Wood Co. DHS v. Larry M.
conclude there was sufficient evidence in the record for the jury to find that Larry had never had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24701 - 2006-03-30

[PDF] WI APP 133
, videotaping, audiotaping, or, through any other electronic means, monitoring or recording the activities
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89025 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
in the record demonstrating that the Department intended to initiate TPR proceedings regardless whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30745 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
‘review the record to determine whether it provides an appropriate basis for the [trial] court’s decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83178 - 2012-05-29