Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7431 - 7440 of 63706 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
subsequently vacated was not time “spent in custody in connection with the course of conduct for which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237752 - 2019-03-21

[PDF] State v. Nicholas A.G.
that Nicholas was a danger to the public and that a No. 97-1652 7 restrictive custodial setting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12589 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
filed separate appeals which we consolidated on our own motion. DISCUSSION ¶9 WISCONSIN STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35587 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. See Poellinger, 153 Wis. 2d at 507. Robinson-Trey also admitted in his custodial statement that A.R
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=468132 - 2022-01-04

[PDF] State v. Tory L. Rachel
that these amendments render ch. 980 unconstitutional on its face. ¶2 Prior to trial, Rachel filed a motion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16357 - 2017-09-21

State v. Tory L. Rachel
. 980 unconstitutional on its face. ¶2 Prior to trial, Rachel filed a motion to dismiss, claiming
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16357 - 2005-03-31

Circuit court eFiling - eFiling on a closed family/paternity case – Wisconsin Court System eFile Support
-judgment change in legal custody or physical placement. $50.00 Yes, a document initiates a request
/hc/en-us/articles/25014085927181-Circuit-court-eFiling-eFiling-on-a-closed-family-paternity-case

State v. Patrick T. Ramsey
.2d 374, 374-76, 222 N.W.2d 620, 621, motion for r’hrg denied, 224 N.W.2d 194 (1974) (appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11340 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
was told he was not in custody, that he was free to leave at any time, and that he did not have to talk
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101708 - 2013-09-10

[PDF] State v. Patrick T. Ramsey
Rainey v. State, 65 Wis.2d 374, 374-76, 222 N.W.2d 620, 621, motion for r’hrg denied, 224 N.W.2d 194
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11340 - 2017-09-19