Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7431 - 7440 of 25978 for bench warrant/1000.
Search results 7431 - 7440 of 25978 for bench warrant/1000.
State v. Jonathan R. Torres
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
of conviction. We conclude that Torres has not demonstrated a “new factor” warranting sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6101 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Johnson
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
was justified under the “plain view” exception to the warrant requirement is subject to this court's de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9964 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
and are fit for release. We do not interpret § 980.09(2)(a) as requiring more unless facts exist that warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11760 - 2005-03-31
and are fit for release. We do not interpret § 980.09(2)(a) as requiring more unless facts exist that warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11760 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Arthur Foster
a search warrant. While the police executed the search warrant, Donna Foster asked Raebel to seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10019 - 2017-09-19
a search warrant. While the police executed the search warrant, Donna Foster asked Raebel to seek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10019 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rayfe J. Paulick
§ 980.09(2)(a) as requiring more unless facts exist that warrant a hearing on whether the committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11760 - 2017-09-20
§ 980.09(2)(a) as requiring more unless facts exist that warrant a hearing on whether the committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11760 - 2017-09-20
State v. John Edward Kraemer
for mistrial, concluding the questioning was not significant enough to warrant a mistrial. Kraemer declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
for mistrial, concluding the questioning was not significant enough to warrant a mistrial. Kraemer declined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18188 - 2005-05-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
together with rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant that intrusion.” [Terry, 392 U.S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert W. Probst v. Peter Chen
. It is undisputed the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6851 - 2017-09-20
. It is undisputed the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6851 - 2017-09-20
Robert W. Probst v. Peter Chen
the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight months old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6851 - 2005-03-31
the contract warranted the scanner was made in 1999 and that the tube was not more than eight months old
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6851 - 2005-03-31
State v. David P. Gascoigne
that: A person may be arrested without a warrant for the violation of a traffic regulation if the traffic officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13684 - 2005-03-31
that: A person may be arrested without a warrant for the violation of a traffic regulation if the traffic officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13684 - 2005-03-31