Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7431 - 7440 of 57154 for id.
Search results 7431 - 7440 of 57154 for id.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
‘a serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea.’” Id. (citation omitted). ¶23 Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045499 - 2025-12-02
‘a serious flaw in the fundamental integrity of the plea.’” Id. (citation omitted). ¶23 Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1045499 - 2025-12-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to counsel, and (2) is competent to proceed pro se.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59523 - 2014-09-15
, intelligently, and voluntarily waived the right to counsel, and (2) is competent to proceed pro se.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59523 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
their technical or special definitional meaning.” Id. We interpret statutory language in the context in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174280 - 2017-09-21
their technical or special definitional meaning.” Id. We interpret statutory language in the context in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174280 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-blown arrest.” Id., ¶¶20, 22. Both such seizures are at issue in this appeal. A. Austin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234663 - 2019-02-12
-blown arrest.” Id., ¶¶20, 22. Both such seizures are at issue in this appeal. A. Austin had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234663 - 2019-02-12
COURT OF APPEALS
to counsel, and (2) is competent to proceed pro se.” Id. “If the [trial] court finds that both conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2011-02-06
to counsel, and (2) is competent to proceed pro se.” Id. “If the [trial] court finds that both conditions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2011-02-06
Stephen P. Gianoli v. John Ronald Pfleiderer
is insufficient. Id. at 360, 124 N.W.2d at 318. The Alsteen court stated that the policy behind these standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9836 - 2005-03-31
is insufficient. Id. at 360, 124 N.W.2d at 318. The Alsteen court stated that the policy behind these standards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9836 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
an improper legal standard or makes a decision not supported by the facts of record. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149262 - 2017-09-21
an improper legal standard or makes a decision not supported by the facts of record. Id. To the extent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is prejudiced by a permitted amendment. See id. ¶13 “The purpose of the information is to inform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149274 - 2017-09-21
is prejudiced by a permitted amendment. See id. ¶13 “The purpose of the information is to inform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149274 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
modification (not resentencing).” No. 2022AP1663-CR 7 defendant.” Id. “[T]he test requires us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759721 - 2024-02-06
modification (not resentencing).” No. 2022AP1663-CR 7 defendant.” Id. “[T]he test requires us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=759721 - 2024-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
modes of procedure.” See id. at 635. No. 2011AP1858-CR 6 279, 797 N.W.2d 524. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92734 - 2014-09-15
modes of procedure.” See id. at 635. No. 2011AP1858-CR 6 279, 797 N.W.2d 524. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92734 - 2014-09-15