Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7431 - 7440 of 65130 for or b.
Search results 7431 - 7440 of 65130 for or b.
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections
(3)(a) and (3)(b). The department interprets the phrase “during residency” as clarifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15537 - 2017-09-21
(3)(a) and (3)(b). The department interprets the phrase “during residency” as clarifying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15537 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adjustment, an inmate must establish one of four grounds specified in WIS. STAT. § 973.195(1r)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110195 - 2017-09-21
adjustment, an inmate must establish one of four grounds specified in WIS. STAT. § 973.195(1r)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110195 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
” that the person has violated Wis. Stat. § 947.013. A violation of § 947.013(1m)(b) occurs when, with the intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96807 - 2013-05-13
” that the person has violated Wis. Stat. § 947.013. A violation of § 947.013(1m)(b) occurs when, with the intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96807 - 2013-05-13
Harlan Richards v. Jerry Smith
of the circuit court for Dane County: PAUL B. HIGGINBOTHAM, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3433 - 2005-03-31
of the circuit court for Dane County: PAUL B. HIGGINBOTHAM, Judge. Affirmed. Before Vergeront, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3433 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
Berman violated SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] ¶6 On October 15, 2013, the parties entered into a stipulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106205 - 2014-01-02
Berman violated SCR 20:8.4(b).[2] ¶6 On October 15, 2013, the parties entered into a stipulation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106205 - 2014-01-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
,” contrary to WIS. STAT. § 806.01(1)(b) (2021- 22).1 Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723951 - 2023-11-02
,” contrary to WIS. STAT. § 806.01(1)(b) (2021- 22).1 Based on our review of the briefs and the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723951 - 2023-11-02
State v. John M. Seth
concentration of 0.113% is sufficient to establish a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b), even if the 0.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5102 - 2005-03-31
concentration of 0.113% is sufficient to establish a violation of Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b), even if the 0.10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Samantha H.
]f a child who has been adjudged delinquent violates a condition specified in sub. (2)(b)7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11547 - 2017-09-19
]f a child who has been adjudged delinquent violates a condition specified in sub. (2)(b)7
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11547 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jeffrey J. Olson
)(a) and (b), Stats., require that the accused person operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10838 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and (b), Stats., require that the accused person operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10838 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
)(b), (d), and 805.15(1) (2011-12).[1] Austin’s appellate claims are moot, meritless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100170 - 2013-08-06
)(b), (d), and 805.15(1) (2011-12).[1] Austin’s appellate claims are moot, meritless
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100170 - 2013-08-06