Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74341 - 74350 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
Search results 74341 - 74350 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
State v. Cameron D.
articulating that it would not second-guess the legislature’s judgment in enacting the notification law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24629 - 2006-03-27
articulating that it would not second-guess the legislature’s judgment in enacting the notification law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24629 - 2006-03-27
[PDF]
State v. William L. Brown
denied the motion in November 1997. ¶4 Brown then appealed to this court and we affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25977 - 2017-09-21
denied the motion in November 1997. ¶4 Brown then appealed to this court and we affirmed the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25977 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Hans Gerger
. Gerger did not appeal from the judgment or the sentence. ¶6 In 1998, Gerger filed a motion in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13995 - 2014-09-15
. Gerger did not appeal from the judgment or the sentence. ¶6 In 1998, Gerger filed a motion in circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13995 - 2014-09-15
Jana Paulson v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
fault with the board’s judgment. We also conclude that the board’s “footprint” formula was a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12959 - 2005-03-31
fault with the board’s judgment. We also conclude that the board’s “footprint” formula was a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of judgment, Cole moved for a new trial. In it, he accused his trial counsel of ineffective assistance. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
of judgment, Cole moved for a new trial. In it, he accused his trial counsel of ineffective assistance. He
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248804 - 2019-10-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the trial court denied. This court affirmed the judgments of conviction, and the two postconviction orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29131 - 2007-06-26
the trial court denied. This court affirmed the judgments of conviction, and the two postconviction orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29131 - 2007-06-26
COURT OF APPEALS
accepted the no-merit report and summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
accepted the no-merit report and summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction and postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34836 - 2008-12-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30579 - 2014-09-15
was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will, not its judgment; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30579 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129294 - 2017-09-21
, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=129294 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
appeals from an order modifying the child support provision in the judgment divorcing her from Kevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42784 - 2014-09-15
appeals from an order modifying the child support provision in the judgment divorcing her from Kevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=42784 - 2014-09-15