Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7441 - 7450 of 74959 for public records.

[PDF] State v. Jack W. Klubertanz
-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Martha K. Askins, asst. state public defender, Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24502 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Donald J. Harman
or subversive to the public interest. Accordingly, we deny Harman's petition for reinstatement.1 Furthermore
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17562 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
On September 6, 2016, the Licenses Committee held a public hearing regarding Buena Vista’s liquor license
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218913 - 2018-09-11

State v. Roosevelt Williams
A. Swartz, assistant state public defender. 2001 WI 21 NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17128 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Roosevelt Williams
and oral argument by Melinda A. Swartz, assistant state public defender. 2001 WI 21 NOTICE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17128 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
in receivership under Anchor Property Management pursuant to declarations that they are public nuisances. After
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194152 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
the record. Trial counsel raised the cultural argument at sentencing, and the circuit court considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57527 - 2010-12-06

[PDF] State v. Michael B. Vernio
, the character of the offender, and the need for protection of the public. State v. Smith, 207 Wis. 2d 258
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7141 - 2017-09-20

State v. Michael B. Vernio
of the offense, the character of the offender, and the need for protection of the public. State v. Smith, 207
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7141 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116859 - 2017-09-21