Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74431 - 74440 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
Search results 74431 - 74440 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
.” In conformity with the court’s comments at sentencing, the judgment of conviction contained a notation stating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103246 - 2017-09-21
.” In conformity with the court’s comments at sentencing, the judgment of conviction contained a notation stating
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103246 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John J. Castellano v. Gary R. McCaughtry
, after the original judgments of conviction were voided, Castellano was resentenced on one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7398 - 2017-09-20
, after the original judgments of conviction were voided, Castellano was resentenced on one count
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7398 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). The record before this court indicates that during the proceedings leading up to the entry of the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
). The record before this court indicates that during the proceedings leading up to the entry of the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216444 - 2018-08-01
State v. James Ware
. On July 29, 1997, we affirmed the judgment and order denying postconviction relief. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7147 - 2005-03-31
. On July 29, 1997, we affirmed the judgment and order denying postconviction relief. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7147 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Urban A. Hubert, Jr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
was “arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment”; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12157 - 2017-09-21
was “arbitrary, oppressive or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment”; and (4) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12157 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2010AP1532-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Oct. 26, 2011), we affirmed the 2008 judgment convicting Arnold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134640 - 2017-09-21
, No. 2010AP1532-CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App Oct. 26, 2011), we affirmed the 2008 judgment convicting Arnold
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134640 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Julie A. Haslbeck v. Darren Haslbeck
grandmother, subsequent to the judgment, and that she expects a distribution of $50,000 from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9162 - 2017-09-19
grandmother, subsequent to the judgment, and that she expects a distribution of $50,000 from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9162 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
in the information. After judgment was entered, Johnson’s counsel filed a no-merit report, identifying three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28708 - 2014-09-15
in the information. After judgment was entered, Johnson’s counsel filed a no-merit report, identifying three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28708 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
that the judgment of conviction is summarily affirmed. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1026741 - 2025-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on Delgado’s behalf. On May 29, 2002, we affirmed the judgment of conviction and order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242366 - 2019-06-17
on Delgado’s behalf. On May 29, 2002, we affirmed the judgment of conviction and order denying
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242366 - 2019-06-17