Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 17267 for Search wicourts.gov.

City of Delavan v. Roger Sterken
, the officers began to search the apartment. The search uncovered more marijuana and drug paraphernalia. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20368 - 2005-11-22

[PDF] State v. Scott A. Teasdale
be suppressed as the fruit of a prior illegal search is a question of constitutional fact. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16005 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 11, 2014 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of A...
eastbound towards the 53rd Street Community School. Officers searched the area and observed Lamont C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107884 - 2014-02-10

State v. Kenneth A. Davis
unreasonable searches was violated when the prosecution elicited testimony from a police officer that Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8648 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to Williams. When the officer opened the passenger door, Williams woke up. Officers searched Williams
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=502740 - 2022-04-05

COURT OF APPEALS
Constitution, and implicates the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Sate v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108716 - 2014-03-05

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the Wisconsin Constitution protect the people from unreasonable searches and seizures. State v. Young, 2006
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82806 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Wilfredo Melo
saw the drugs fall to the floor when DeValkenaere was searching Melo's waistband area
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11060 - 2017-09-19

State v. Scott A. Teasdale
Whether evidence should be suppressed as the fruit of a prior illegal search is a question
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16005 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Sate v. Williams, 2001 WI 21, ¶18
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108716 - 2017-09-21