Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 82833 for case search.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 82833 for case search.
State v. Donald J. Matta
Wis.2d 506, 522, 210 N.W.2d 873, 882 (1973), this was not the case here. The initial showup where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7835 - 2005-03-31
Wis.2d 506, 522, 210 N.W.2d 873, 882 (1973), this was not the case here. The initial showup where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7835 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald J. Matta
the record for purposes of considering a suppression motion after he was appointed to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7835 - 2017-09-19
the record for purposes of considering a suppression motion after he was appointed to the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7835 - 2017-09-19
City of Sun Prairie v. William D. Davis
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1651 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17275 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-1651 Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17275 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. State v. Pinkard, 2010
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453148 - 2021-11-16
[PDF]
Herbert E. Droste v. David H. Schwarz
about whether the officer knew he could have searched Droste’s apartment without a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15671 - 2017-09-21
about whether the officer knew he could have searched Droste’s apartment without a search warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15671 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
him to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
him to a search. We affirm the circuit court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82117 - 2012-05-07
State v. Steven W. Nielson
is a search under the Fourth Amendment. County of Milwaukee v. Proegler, 95 Wis. 2d 614, 623, 291 N.W.2d 608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5885 - 2005-03-31
is a search under the Fourth Amendment. County of Milwaukee v. Proegler, 95 Wis. 2d 614, 623, 291 N.W.2d 608
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5885 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
or physically intimidated the defendant …; (3) whether the conditions attending the request to search were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57605 - 2014-09-15
or physically intimidated the defendant …; (3) whether the conditions attending the request to search were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57605 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven W. Nielson
the preliminary breath test. Taking one’s breath for a preliminary breath test is a search under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5885 - 2017-09-19
the preliminary breath test. Taking one’s breath for a preliminary breath test is a search under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5885 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
issues in addition to our obligation in a no-merit appeal to independently search the record for any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44866 - 2009-12-21
issues in addition to our obligation in a no-merit appeal to independently search the record for any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44866 - 2009-12-21