Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 24443 for extending.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 24443 for extending.
COURT OF APPEALS
. The court sentenced him to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50501 - 2010-06-01
. The court sentenced him to four years’ initial confinement and six years’ extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50501 - 2010-06-01
CA Blank Order
years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision.[2] The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142765 - 2015-06-09
years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended supervision.[2] The no-merit report addresses
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142765 - 2015-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
term of imprisonment consisting of fourteen years of initial confinement and eleven years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291023 - 2020-09-24
term of imprisonment consisting of fourteen years of initial confinement and eleven years of extended
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=291023 - 2020-09-24
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Richardson’s pleas were entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97081 - 2013-05-16
of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Richardson’s pleas were entered knowingly
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97081 - 2013-05-16
Raymond L. Schneider v. Jacqueline G. Watley
1, 1993, as extended to January 5, 1994, until sometime beyond the court's May 12, 1994 dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8675 - 2005-03-31
1, 1993, as extended to January 5, 1994, until sometime beyond the court's May 12, 1994 dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8675 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Schultz’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792615 - 2024-04-30
confinement and five years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Schultz’s plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=792615 - 2024-04-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to eight years’ initial confinement and seven years’ extended supervision. We agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=429211 - 2021-09-21
to eight years’ initial confinement and seven years’ extended supervision. We agree with counsel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=429211 - 2021-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to six years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260654 - 2020-05-19
to six years of initial confinement and three years of extended supervision. The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260654 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
Dale D. Malueg v. Gregory D. Malueg
to extend, modify or reverse existing law. Here, Dale and/or his attorney knew or should have known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14812 - 2017-09-21
to extend, modify or reverse existing law. Here, Dale and/or his attorney knew or should have known
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14812 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Gonzalez’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732052 - 2023-11-22
confinement and fifteen years of extended supervision. The no-merit report addresses whether Gonzalez’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=732052 - 2023-11-22