Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 15257 for mark's.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 15257 for mark's.
State v. Tony G. Merriweather
will not be published in the official reports. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Circuit Judge Mark A. Frankel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12558 - 2005-03-31
will not be published in the official reports. See Rule 809.23(1)(b)5, Stats. [1] Circuit Judge Mark A. Frankel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12558 - 2005-03-31
William Engelhart v. June C. Engelhart
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: MARK A. FRANKEL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13404 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Dane County: MARK A. FRANKEL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13404 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Notice Sonya Bice Electronic Notice Mark S. Rosen Electronic Notice You are hereby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650570 - 2023-05-02
Notice Sonya Bice Electronic Notice Mark S. Rosen Electronic Notice You are hereby
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650570 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
marks omitted). 2 The circuit court granted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112196 - 2017-09-21
marks omitted). 2 The circuit court granted
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112196 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Fond du Lac v. Kathleen M. Flood
test of her breath, Flood refused. Instead of simply marking a refusal, however, the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3289 - 2017-09-19
test of her breath, Flood refused. Instead of simply marking a refusal, however, the officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3289 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.”) (citations and two sets of quotation marks omitted). We agree that Crouthers’s motion was properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73388 - 2014-09-15
.”) (citations and two sets of quotation marks omitted). We agree that Crouthers’s motion was properly denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73388 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lydia Santiago v. Kathleen Ware
, then crossed out. Interpreting the resulting composite mark required judgment. Moreover, as Santiago states
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8494 - 2017-09-19
, then crossed out. Interpreting the resulting composite mark required judgment. Moreover, as Santiago states
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8494 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of internal quotation marks omitted; ellipses in original). ¶17 The trial court found that the narrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208363 - 2018-02-13
of internal quotation marks omitted; ellipses in original). ¶17 The trial court found that the narrative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208363 - 2018-02-13
[PDF]
State v. Kevin W. Coffey
, which was marked with a twenty-five m.p.h. cautionary sign.2 Again the officer noticed the odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10762 - 2017-09-20
, which was marked with a twenty-five m.p.h. cautionary sign.2 Again the officer noticed the odor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10762 - 2017-09-20
State v. Robin R. Fecci
, the State objected to the amendment. But the State also misses the mark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14268 - 2005-03-31
, the State objected to the amendment. But the State also misses the mark
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14268 - 2005-03-31