Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 49819 for our.
Search results 7451 - 7460 of 49819 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
, and upon our independent review of the record, we concluded there were no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
, and upon our independent review of the record, we concluded there were no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
State v. Patricia E. K.
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
impose those sentences on the assumption that our community needs a lever over you when you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
impose those sentences on the assumption that our community needs a lever over you when you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165492 - 2017-09-21
not to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court, it is within our power to do so. 4 See Glendenning’s Limestone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100678 - 2017-09-21
by the circuit court, it is within our power to do so. 4 See Glendenning’s Limestone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100678 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. James Darius Jones
to exercise our discretionary reversal power under WIS. STAT. § 752.35. As the State points out, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6561 - 2017-09-19
to exercise our discretionary reversal power under WIS. STAT. § 752.35. As the State points out, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6561 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bryant E. Carter
N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4960 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 580 (1989). Our review is limited to whether the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4960 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and in affirming the revocation decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184924 - 2017-09-21
and in affirming the revocation decision of the Division of Hearings and Appeals. Based upon our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184924 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
lifetime imprisonment as a persistent repeater. Our review of the appellate record satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581727 - 2022-10-26
lifetime imprisonment as a persistent repeater. Our review of the appellate record satisfies us
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=581727 - 2022-10-26
COURT OF APPEALS
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶5 Our supreme court requires convicted defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98457 - 2013-06-24
of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶6. ¶5 Our supreme court requires convicted defendants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98457 - 2013-06-24