Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7461 - 7470 of 30126 for consulta de causas.

Policemen Relief Association v. Linda L. Krueger
of Madison, 113 Wis.2d 112, 115-16, 334 N.W.2d 580, 582-83 (Ct. App. 1983). Our review is de novo. See id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11244 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Whether an appeal states a claim upon which relief may be granted is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745130 - 2023-12-27

State v. Jeffrey G. Steffensen
passes statutory and constitutional muster are questions of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2696 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
. No. 2013AP201-FT 3 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97998 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Daniel W. Corrigan
principles is de novo. State v. Woods, 117 Wis.2d 701, 712, 345 N.W.2d 457, 463 (1984). The initial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8888 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Rock County Department of Human Services v. Tawanna W.
issues present questions of law that are reviewed de novo. Door County DHFS v. Scott S., 230 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7468 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for an alternative test pursuant to WIS. STAT. ยง 343.305 was made is a question of law reviewed de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91385 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Oscar Jasper
for an action is a question of law, which we review de novo. Irby v. Young, 139 Wis. 2d 279, 281, 407 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2824 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
is a matter of law we review de novo. Borchardt v. Wilk, 156 Wis. 2d 420, 427, 456 N.W.2d 653 (Ct. App. 1990
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45092 - 2009-12-28

State v. Greg A. Groesbeck
, a conclusion of law this court reviews de novo. State v. Keith, 216 Wis. 2d 61, 69, 573 N.W.2d 888 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4700 - 2005-03-31