Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7461 - 7470 of 68502 for did.
Search results 7461 - 7470 of 68502 for did.
State v. Jimmie Johnson
the road somewhere” because he did not want trouble in front of the tavern. As Caldwell turned to go back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5315 - 2005-03-31
the road somewhere” because he did not want trouble in front of the tavern. As Caldwell turned to go back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5315 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and charged items on those cards, didn’t you? [MABLE K.]: Yes. [DEPARTMENT COUNSEL]: And you did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116722 - 2014-07-09
and charged items on those cards, didn’t you? [MABLE K.]: Yes. [DEPARTMENT COUNSEL]: And you did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116722 - 2014-07-09
[PDF]
WI App 57
papers was present outside the gate of [her] residential neighborhood,” and she did not instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399168 - 2021-09-08
papers was present outside the gate of [her] residential neighborhood,” and she did not instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399168 - 2021-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
that the error was harmless. For the reasons we explain below, we also conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
that the error was harmless. For the reasons we explain below, we also conclude that the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30959 - 2007-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Tremell Jackson
pretrial, Jackson decided that he did not want to accept the reduced recommendation and the case remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6730 - 2017-09-20
pretrial, Jackson decided that he did not want to accept the reduced recommendation and the case remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6730 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and charged items on those cards, didn’t you? [MABLE K.]: Yes. [DEPARTMENT COUNSEL]: And you did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
and charged items on those cards, didn’t you? [MABLE K.]: Yes. [DEPARTMENT COUNSEL]: And you did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116722 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Lewis Flynn
On August 1, 2003, we reinstated Flynn’s right to a direct appeal on grounds that he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06
On August 1, 2003, we reinstated Flynn’s right to a direct appeal on grounds that he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21222 - 2006-02-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Public Defender to see if it would appoint successor counsel. ¶3 The circuit court did not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651725 - 2023-05-03
Public Defender to see if it would appoint successor counsel. ¶3 The circuit court did not decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=651725 - 2023-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
that DeMarco’s insurance did not provide coverage for the losses claimed in the lawsuit against DeMarco. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106012 - 2013-12-26
that DeMarco’s insurance did not provide coverage for the losses claimed in the lawsuit against DeMarco. Since
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106012 - 2013-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was played to the jury and did not err in determining that nothing prejudicial was played. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247873 - 2019-10-02
was played to the jury and did not err in determining that nothing prejudicial was played. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247873 - 2019-10-02