Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7461 - 7470 of 83805 for simple case search.
Search results 7461 - 7470 of 83805 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
paraphernalia. He claims his residence was subjected to an unreasonable probation search, and he challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110362 - 2014-04-14
paraphernalia. He claims his residence was subjected to an unreasonable probation search, and he challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110362 - 2014-04-14
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN
2008 WI App 143 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2346-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
2008 WI App 143 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2007AP2346-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33800 - 2008-09-23
[PDF]
WI APP 143
2008 WI APP 143 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP2346-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
2008 WI APP 143 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP2346-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33800 - 2014-09-15
State v. David Lee Greenwood
argues that the pat-down search conducted by Officer Holley was not supported by articulable facts giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31
argues that the pat-down search conducted by Officer Holley was not supported by articulable facts giving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12543 - 2005-03-31
State v. James E. Schultz
facts inserted in the officer's affidavit, probable cause to search Schultz's residence was not erased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
facts inserted in the officer's affidavit, probable cause to search Schultz's residence was not erased
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10215 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Knotts contends the warrant was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28281 - 2014-09-15
to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant. Knotts contends the warrant was not supported
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28281 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David Lee Greenwood
in denying his motion to suppress. He argues that the pat-down search conducted by Officer Holley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12543 - 2017-09-21
in denying his motion to suppress. He argues that the pat-down search conducted by Officer Holley
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12543 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a probation search initiated by Department of Corrections (DOC) agents.2 Based on information received from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922984 - 2025-03-06
with a probation search initiated by Department of Corrections (DOC) agents.2 Based on information received from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922984 - 2025-03-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with a probation search initiated by Department of Corrections (DOC) agents.2 Based on information received from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922984 - 2025-03-06
with a probation search initiated by Department of Corrections (DOC) agents.2 Based on information received from
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=922984 - 2025-03-06
CA Blank Order
in a no-knock entry because the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient and the inventory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96370 - 2013-05-07
in a no-knock entry because the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient and the inventory
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96370 - 2013-05-07