Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74631 - 74640 of 77516 for judgment for u s.
Search results 74631 - 74640 of 77516 for judgment for u s.
State v. Bobby Joe Smith
. The trial court denied the motion on June 1, 1993. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction on March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8295 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court denied the motion on June 1, 1993. This court affirmed the judgment of conviction on March
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8295 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, to which Ellis responded. This court summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04
, to which Ellis responded. This court summarily affirmed the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92348 - 2013-02-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
gives notice of entry of judgment, which did not occur here. See WIS. STAT. § 808.04(1). The only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144518 - 2017-09-21
gives notice of entry of judgment, which did not occur here. See WIS. STAT. § 808.04(1). The only
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144518 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30
. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment and order are summarily affirmed. WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756081 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189786 - 2017-09-21
no other potential issue for appeal. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of conviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189786 - 2017-09-21
Jana Paulson v. St. Croix County Board of Adjustment
fault with the board’s judgment. We also conclude that the board’s “footprint” formula was a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12959 - 2005-03-31
fault with the board’s judgment. We also conclude that the board’s “footprint” formula was a rational
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12959 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP1680-CRNM, unpublished slip op. & order (WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92348 - 2014-09-15
the judgment of conviction. See State v. Ellis, No. 2003AP1680-CRNM, unpublished slip op. & order (WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92348 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
accepted the no-merit report and affirmed the judgment of conviction on January 14, 2005. We stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58005 - 2014-09-15
accepted the no-merit report and affirmed the judgment of conviction on January 14, 2005. We stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58005 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeremy M. F.
. This court is not to substitute its judgment for the No. 97-1063 3 fact finder unless it relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12344 - 2017-09-21
. This court is not to substitute its judgment for the No. 97-1063 3 fact finder unless it relied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12344 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a child. This court affirmed his judgment of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100170 - 2017-09-21
of a child. This court affirmed his judgment of conviction and the order denying postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100170 - 2017-09-21