Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 74681 - 74690 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
Search results 74681 - 74690 of 77346 for judgment for u s.
State v. Armond N. Henderson
of the record. After such, we concluded that Henderson’s judgment should be affirmed because the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26419 - 2006-09-11
of the record. After such, we concluded that Henderson’s judgment should be affirmed because the record did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26419 - 2006-09-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a 2 The Honorable James Fiedler presided over the original proceedings and entered the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15
a 2 The Honorable James Fiedler presided over the original proceedings and entered the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=666218 - 2023-06-15
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
., joined. Andrew Waity v. Devin Lemahieu: THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ARE REVERSED
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483618 - 2022-02-09
., joined. Andrew Waity v. Devin Lemahieu: THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT ARE REVERSED
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=483618 - 2022-02-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
appeals a judgment of conviction entered upon his guilty plea to one count of attempted first-degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174459 - 2017-09-21
appeals a judgment of conviction entered upon his guilty plea to one count of attempted first-degree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174459 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Thompson
may summarily reverse a judgment or order if the respondent fails to file a brief, Rule 809.83(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5910 - 2017-09-19
may summarily reverse a judgment or order if the respondent fails to file a brief, Rule 809.83(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5910 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
evidentiary test of his breath or blood was unreasonable. This order resulted in a judgment imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
evidentiary test of his breath or blood was unreasonable. This order resulted in a judgment imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=835159 - 2024-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, this court may not substitute its judgment for that of the jury unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103880 - 2017-09-21
, this court may not substitute its judgment for that of the jury unless the evidence, viewed most
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103880 - 2017-09-21
State v. David L. Gray
, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. ¶3 Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
, and this court affirmed the judgment of conviction and the postconviction order. ¶3 Gray
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
Judgment,” in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel, newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90306 - 2012-12-12
Judgment,” in which he alleged ineffective assistance of trial counsel, newly discovered evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90306 - 2012-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the judgment of conviction to indicate that the sentence would be “concurrent” rather than “consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173355 - 2017-09-21
the judgment of conviction to indicate that the sentence would be “concurrent” rather than “consecutive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173355 - 2017-09-21