Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7471 - 7480 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7471 - 7480 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
County of Bayfield v. Michael Emil Sulla
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31, 263
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
is a question of law this court reviews de novo. Hutson v. State of Wis. Personnel Comm’n, 2003 WI 97, ¶31, 263
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19243 - 2005-08-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Temporarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33826 - 2014-09-15
of constitutional principles to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. ¶8 Temporarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33826 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
a prima facie case is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶7 At issue here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30036 - 2007-08-20
a prima facie case is a question of law that we review de novo. See id. ¶7 At issue here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30036 - 2007-08-20
[PDF]
Town of Geneva v. Adrienne E. Cox
permissible. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11731 - 2017-09-20
permissible. This presents a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Krier, 165 Wis.2d 673
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11731 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18
. 2d 118, 765 N.W.2d 569. We review de novo whether the facts lead to reasonable suspicion. Id. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85108 - 2012-07-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is a question of law that this court considers de novo, while determining whether a new factor warrants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
is a question of law that this court considers de novo, while determining whether a new factor warrants
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=857149 - 2024-10-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Henley, 2010 WI 97, ¶29, 328 Wis. 2d 544
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891247 - 2024-12-17
presents a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Henley, 2010 WI 97, ¶29, 328 Wis. 2d 544
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=891247 - 2024-12-17
COURT OF APPEALS
OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92523 - 2013-02-06
OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92523 - 2013-02-06
State v. David L. Gray
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo. State v. Tolefree, 209 Wis. 2d 421, 424, 563
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26195 - 2006-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
is reviewed de novo. State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170, ¶18, 238 Wis. 2d 301, 617 N.W.2d 175. “Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57072 - 2010-11-23
is reviewed de novo. State v. Murdock, 2000 WI App 170, ¶18, 238 Wis. 2d 301, 617 N.W.2d 175. “Statutory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57072 - 2010-11-23