Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7471 - 7480 of 30118 for consulta de causas.

State v. Richard W. Foelker
is a question of law subject to de novo review by this court. See State v. Ford, 211 Wis.2d 739, 743, 565 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13361 - 2005-03-31

Frontsheet
conclusions of law are subject to de novo review. Id. We determine the appropriate level of discipline
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89505 - 2012-11-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
evidence to support an award of punitive damages is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶¶31
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=179680 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
of the decedent's will presents a legal question which we review de novo. Holy Family Convent, 157 Wis.2d at 195
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8902 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
on grounds of newly-discovered evidence is a constitutional question which we review de novo.” Id. ¶8 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26786 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See id. ¶7 “Not all encounters with law enforcement officers are ‘seizures
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101950 - 2013-09-16

[PDF] Valerie B. Adler v. Stephen I. Adler
retained its identity and character are questions of law that we review de novo. Estate of Lloyd, 170
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12460 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we address de novo. State v. Perez, 2001 WI 79, ¶12, 244 Wis. 2d 582, 628 N.W.2d 820
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143694 - 2015-06-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. Martin J. De Vries Circuit Court Judge Electronic Notice Sherry Coykendall Clerk of Circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=925540 - 2025-03-12

[PDF] Desiree Lynn Price v. Boyceville Community School District
293, 296, 349 N.W.2d 733 (Ct. App. 1984). We review summary judgments de novo. Mullen v. Walczak
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7600 - 2017-09-19