Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7471 - 7480 of 49819 for our.
Search results 7471 - 7480 of 49819 for our.
09AP935 State v. Michael A. Woodford
appeared at the court review hearing by counsel. Counsel stated, “[A]n extension is the, in our view I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
appeared at the court review hearing by counsel. Counsel stated, “[A]n extension is the, in our view I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593015 - 2022-11-22
to the no-merit report, but he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593015 - 2022-11-22
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶6 WISCONSIN STAT. § 805.14(1) sets forth the standard that applies to our review of a challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48942 - 2014-09-15
. ¶6 WISCONSIN STAT. § 805.14(1) sets forth the standard that applies to our review of a challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48942 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of D’Antonio’s plea. Our review of the record— including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644955 - 2023-04-18
of D’Antonio’s plea. Our review of the record— including the plea questionnaire and waiver of rights form
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644955 - 2023-04-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
the order denying his postconviction motion. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=955621 - 2025-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, and upon our independent review of the record, we concluded there were no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
, and upon our independent review of the record, we concluded there were no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39487 - 2009-08-17
State v. Patricia E. K.
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
to apply the balancing test put forth in Phifer v. State, 64 Wis. 2d 24, 218 N.W.2d 354 (1974), where our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20695 - 2005-12-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
impose those sentences on the assumption that our community needs a lever over you when you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
impose those sentences on the assumption that our community needs a lever over you when you’re
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27935 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165492 - 2017-09-21
not to file a response. Upon consideration of the no-merit report and our independent
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=165492 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court, it is within our power to do so. 4 See Glendenning’s Limestone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100678 - 2017-09-21
by the circuit court, it is within our power to do so. 4 See Glendenning’s Limestone
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100678 - 2017-09-21