Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7471 - 7480 of 83758 for simple case search.
Search results 7471 - 7480 of 83758 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Exhibit 50 was a simple summary of other evidence in the case. It did not require its preparer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76728 - 2014-09-15
, Exhibit 50 was a simple summary of other evidence in the case. It did not require its preparer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76728 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of unfair prejudice with Exhibit 50 in this case. Unlike the computer simulation, Exhibit 50 was a simple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76728 - 2012-01-17
of unfair prejudice with Exhibit 50 in this case. Unlike the computer simulation, Exhibit 50 was a simple
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76728 - 2012-01-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
no faith that a simple period of time, a short period of time in the First Offender’s Program is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175101 - 2017-09-21
no faith that a simple period of time, a short period of time in the First Offender’s Program is going
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175101 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
to Jesse’s best interests or the best interests of the public for the juvenile court to hear the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26894 - 2014-09-15
to Jesse’s best interests or the best interests of the public for the juvenile court to hear the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26894 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a warrant to search Burger’s residence for evidence of drug dealing. The application for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
a warrant to search Burger’s residence for evidence of drug dealing. The application for the search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170175 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
suppression motion, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Consent is an exception to the rule that warrantless searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49114 - 2014-09-15
suppression motion, we affirm the judgment. ¶2 Consent is an exception to the rule that warrantless searches
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49114 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Lance D. Pelky
motion to suppress the marijuana seized during a pat-down search performed by officer James Schaut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17656 - 2017-09-21
motion to suppress the marijuana seized during a pat-down search performed by officer James Schaut
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17656 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
J.W. while the other men searched the apartment. Sholar and James removed guns, gun cases, and gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374319 - 2021-06-08
J.W. while the other men searched the apartment. Sholar and James removed guns, gun cases, and gun
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=374319 - 2021-06-08
State v. James Lanzel
in the apartment of respondent James Lanzel. Based on our review of the affidavit and the search warrant, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8339 - 2005-03-31
in the apartment of respondent James Lanzel. Based on our review of the affidavit and the search warrant, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8339 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Lanzel
James Lanzel. Based on our review of the affidavit and the search warrant, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8339 - 2017-09-19
James Lanzel. Based on our review of the affidavit and the search warrant, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8339 - 2017-09-19