Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7481 - 7490 of 80688 for petition to establish custody.
Search results 7481 - 7490 of 80688 for petition to establish custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“shall be given credit toward the service of his or her sentence for all days spent in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
“shall be given credit toward the service of his or her sentence for all days spent in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=876431 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of credit for the intimidation conviction, asserting that Jones had been in custody since June 11, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322379 - 2021-01-12
of credit for the intimidation conviction, asserting that Jones had been in custody since June 11, 2018
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=322379 - 2021-01-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on September 21, 2017 (“the first challenged order”), which addressed legal custody, physical placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037724 - 2025-11-13
on September 21, 2017 (“the first challenged order”), which addressed legal custody, physical placement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037724 - 2025-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of sentence credit for his time in custody in December 2018. The court concludes that Senner could pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425360 - 2021-09-10
of sentence credit for his time in custody in December 2018. The court concludes that Senner could pursue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=425360 - 2021-09-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on September 21, 2017 (“the first challenged order”), which addressed legal custody, physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037724 - 2025-11-13
on September 21, 2017 (“the first challenged order”), which addressed legal custody, physical placement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1037724 - 2025-11-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a person into custody as a repeater. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
a person into custody as a repeater. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a person into custody as a repeater. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
a person into custody as a repeater. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698671 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
Dane Co. DHS v. Todd S.
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25107 - 2017-09-21
with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision by the Court of Appeals. See WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25107 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not establish that Smith understood the elements of bail jumping. At the postconviction motion hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105377 - 2017-09-21
not establish that Smith understood the elements of bail jumping. At the postconviction motion hearing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=105377 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
conceded that the plea colloquy was defective because the circuit court did not establish that Smith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105377 - 2013-12-10
conceded that the plea colloquy was defective because the circuit court did not establish that Smith
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105377 - 2013-12-10