Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7491 - 7500 of 27365 for ad.

State v. Lynn H. Mickle
. at 359 (emphasis added). Moreover, when applying this second Batson step, the trial court does
/ca/errata/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9539 - 2005-03-31

City of New Berlin v. Jeffery D. Eggum
, the vehicle touched the fog line. The officer also added to these observations the fact that it was 2:40
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14059 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Thornon T.
on 02/23/95. Thornon also refused to sign the new aftercare conditions which were added to his rules
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10301 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.” There was no objection from the State or the guardian ad litem.4 After hearing additional testimony from the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=997145 - 2025-08-19

2007 WI APP 49
relief necessary to make the employee whole.” (Emphasis added.) Such relief includes, “reinstatement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28228 - 2007-03-27

State v. D'Juan T. Turner
the kidnapping statute) was added to the information.[3] Thus, the same crime was alleged before and after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7104 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Renee A. Fredel
that if the accused takes one or more tests and "the result of any test" (emphasis added) indicates the accused has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9725 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Wangard Partners, Inc. v. Tandem Tire and Auto Service, Inc.
or the party’s attorney. Wisconsin Stat. § 807.05 (emphasis added). There are thus two requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20067 - 2017-09-21

State v. Renee A. Fredel
test" (emphasis added) indicates the accused has a prohibited alcohol concentration, operating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9725 - 2005-03-31

State v. Margaret H.
.-H., twin boys born in February of 1993, appeal, by their guardian ad litem, the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15591 - 2005-03-31