Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7491 - 7500 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
Search results 7491 - 7500 of 30108 for consulta de causas.
State v. Thomas R. Kinnaman
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10903 - 2005-03-31
review de novo. State v. Drogsvold, 104 Wis.2d 247, 262, 311 N.W.2d 243, 250 (Ct. App. 1981
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10903 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
N.W.2d 830 (1990), and reviews the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo, id. at 138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
N.W.2d 830 (1990), and reviews the constitutionality of a search or seizure de novo, id. at 138
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123386 - 2014-10-08
COURT OF APPEALS
a new factor is a question of law that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99746 - 2013-07-22
a new factor is a question of law that this court considers de novo. Id., ¶33. If the facts do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99746 - 2013-07-22
Allison Markunas v. West Bend Mutual Insurance Company
review of this case is de novo because this appeal involves the interpretation of an insurance policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9859 - 2005-03-31
review of this case is de novo because this appeal involves the interpretation of an insurance policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9859 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. This is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69708 - 2011-08-16
. This is a question of statutory interpretation which we review de novo. City of La Crosse v. Richling, 178 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69708 - 2011-08-16
COURT OF APPEALS
of a new factor. Id. Whether a new factor exists is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-08
of a new factor. Id. Whether a new factor exists is a question of law subject to de novo review. Id., ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121309 - 2014-09-08
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo.” See State v. Ninham, 2011 WI 33, ¶44, 333 Wis. 2d 335, 797 N.W.2d 451
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127949 - 2014-11-17
that we review de novo.” See State v. Ninham, 2011 WI 33, ¶44, 333 Wis. 2d 335, 797 N.W.2d 451
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127949 - 2014-11-17
COURT OF APPEALS
requires the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case,” which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33803 - 2008-08-20
requires the application of constitutional principles to the facts of the case,” which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33803 - 2008-08-20
COURT OF APPEALS
of law and fact. Interpretation of a contract is a question of law reviewed de novo, but the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133129 - 2015-01-20
of law and fact. Interpretation of a contract is a question of law reviewed de novo, but the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133129 - 2015-01-20
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles are reviewed de novo. Id. ¶8 Holbrook had sufficient reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90656 - 2012-12-17
to constitutional principles are reviewed de novo. Id. ¶8 Holbrook had sufficient reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90656 - 2012-12-17