Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 7491 - 7500 of 51893 for him.
Search results 7491 - 7500 of 51893 for him.
State v. Robert J. Lochemes
and subsequently placed him under arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7580 - 2005-03-31
and subsequently placed him under arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7580 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard R. Burch
" offering to help "Randy/Bank" and "Rico" (Richard Burch) in their cases if they paid him money.[2] Burch's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9952 - 2005-03-31
" offering to help "Randy/Bank" and "Rico" (Richard Burch) in their cases if they paid him money.[2] Burch's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9952 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey G. Meixelsperger
. DYKMAN, P.J.[1] Jeffrey G. Meixelsperger appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12906 - 2005-03-31
. DYKMAN, P.J.[1] Jeffrey G. Meixelsperger appeals from a judgment convicting him of operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12906 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Monte J. Hephner
to take a chemical test because the officer lacked probable cause to arrest him for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5837 - 2017-09-19
to take a chemical test because the officer lacked probable cause to arrest him for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5837 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Jerry D. Gragg
implicated him in operating the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
implicated him in operating the vehicle while intoxicated—did not provide sufficient probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7633 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to him as “the petitioner.” We reject the single argument made by the petitioner on appeal. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248908 - 2019-10-17
to him as “the petitioner.” We reject the single argument made by the petitioner on appeal. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248908 - 2019-10-17
[PDF]
State v. Kiemonte Lamont King
)(1), STATS. He argues that police stopped and searched him illegally and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10730 - 2017-09-20
)(1), STATS. He argues that police stopped and searched him illegally and, therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10730 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of two counts of delivering between one and five grams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107529 - 2017-09-21
, entered upon a jury’s verdict, convicting him of two counts of delivering between one and five grams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107529 - 2017-09-21
State v. John D. Tiggs, Jr.
, Tiggs never complained to the court that the charging documents called him by the wrong name. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4459 - 2005-03-31
, Tiggs never complained to the court that the charging documents called him by the wrong name. In fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4459 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis C. Tevik
read him a defective Informing the Accused form. Next, he argues that the State should be judicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9841 - 2005-03-31
read him a defective Informing the Accused form. Next, he argues that the State should be judicially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9841 - 2005-03-31