Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75041 - 75050 of 77679 for restraining order/1000.

Village of Oregon v. Robyn R. Sunday
affect our review. [3] We note that Sunday contends that, in order to conduct a traffic stop based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5899 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the phrase “‘otherwise disorderly conduct’ means conduct having a tendency to disrupt good order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215691 - 2018-07-17

[PDF] NOTICE
testimony, the court noted that “[t]here were a number of times when he had to stop in order to get
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39222 - 2014-09-15

State v. Robert J. Capps
that there are no arguable appellate issues. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction and postconviction order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11931 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 7, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
had to have drunk six to seven drinks immediately prior to the stop in order to reach the 0.17 level
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28031 - 2007-02-06

State v. James R. Boardman
for court hearings, submit to orders and process of the court, notify the court clerk of any change
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13084 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Roberta K. Long v. Russell S. Long
to this court's order dated October 20, 1994, this case was submitted to the court on the expedited appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8136 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Mark R. Zweber v. Melar Ltd., Inc.
CANE, C.J. Mark Zweber appeals an order granting Melar Ltd., Inc.’s, motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21206 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bruce Nuttleman
as a witness. No objection need be made in order to preserve the point.” No. 97-2914-CR 8 902.01(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13102 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Town of Mount Pleasant v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company
for the proposition that notice from the insured does not have to meet technical requirements in order to trigger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2287 - 2017-09-19