Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 75081 - 75090 of 82591 for simple case.
Search results 75081 - 75090 of 82591 for simple case.
[PDF]
State v. Stanley E. Young
office or employment to take another into custody. Therefore, in the context of this case, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3355 - 2017-09-19
office or employment to take another into custody. Therefore, in the context of this case, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3355 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
of February 11, 2010 ….” Tammy argues “the real issue in this case involves a comparison of the situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
of February 11, 2010 ….” Tammy argues “the real issue in this case involves a comparison of the situation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76882 - 2012-01-23
CA Blank Order
if the petition is not contested. See § 48.422(3). Relief from a default judgment in a TPR case is available
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110976 - 2014-04-22
if the petition is not contested. See § 48.422(3). Relief from a default judgment in a TPR case is available
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110976 - 2014-04-22
State v. Douglas E. Vest, Jr.
that it had offered her consideration in a pending perjury case in exchange for her testimony. Johnson denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12511 - 2005-03-31
that it had offered her consideration in a pending perjury case in exchange for her testimony. Johnson denied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12511 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles B. Bushong
. We conclude that the facts of this case do not show a violation of the detainer statute. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5654 - 2005-03-31
. We conclude that the facts of this case do not show a violation of the detainer statute. Accordingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5654 - 2005-03-31
Pauline Orsted v. Ervin Orsted
omitted). In this case, an equalizing payment was required but the time at which payment was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12130 - 2005-03-31
omitted). In this case, an equalizing payment was required but the time at which payment was due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12130 - 2005-03-31
County of Marathon v. Troy Kuyoth
(Ct. App. 1987). The question before this court is whether the undisputed facts of this case fulfill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12050 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1987). The question before this court is whether the undisputed facts of this case fulfill
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12050 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
with Kevon’s counsel that there would be no arguable merit to challenging the disposition of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127943 - 2014-11-09
with Kevon’s counsel that there would be no arguable merit to challenging the disposition of the case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127943 - 2014-11-09
State v. Byron A. Anderson
for arrest at that time. In OWI cases, probable cause will be found “where the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
for arrest at that time. In OWI cases, probable cause will be found “where the totality of the circumstances
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18439 - 2005-06-06
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94984 - 2013-04-01
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition and summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94984 - 2013-04-01